[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] `guard' is crazy

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote:
I've said it before but it's worth repeating: "guard" is not a good
error handling construct.

Perhaps not, but it's what R6RS provides, and
with-exception-handler is much too low-level.

I think people should provide alternatives to
guard in SRFIs and/or the large language, and
maybe we can replace guard in R8RS.


Scheme-reports mailing list