[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov scripsit:
> So, RRS's (fluid) redux (or shall I say Rabbit redux). Its so
> well-hidden I didn't know it existed. Any plans on going back
> that for R7RS?
It's under WG1 ballot, and I think if it doesn't make WG1, it will
very likely make WG2. There are several variants available besides the
It's easy to implement parameters portably in a non-threaded
system, so the proposals are about how mutation (as
opposed to rebinding, which is per-thread) interacts with
defines parameters as thread-safe under mutation, whereas
If I read "upcoming" in [the newspaper] John Cowan
once more, I will be downcoming http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and somebody will be outgoing. cowan@x
Scheme-reports mailing list