Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS

[Andre van Tonder <andre@x>]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Jim Wise wrote:

> John Cowan's suggestion of naming the module-provided forms of
> these such that they override the corresponding core forms on import (by
> default) seems a good compromise

Just note, FWIW, that R6RS library semantics have no such thing as "overriding". 
You would need to do a complicated EXCEPT import to exclude the usual WG1 
meanings.



_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports