[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
Per Bothner scripsit:
> "Problem" is a strange word in this context - that eqv? was defined
> as equal? is irrelevant to what is happening (at least for Kawa).
> The reason the result is #t is that (as you mention elsewhere):
> implementations are free to make literal strings eqv? if they have
> the same content.
Oops, I forgot to control for that. The jury will disregard what I said.
Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan
in any language. --Ed Post cowan@x
Scheme-reports mailing list