Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS

[Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>]

On 01/21/11 09:25, David Rush wrote:

> Are we really willing to go here? I'd be up for it, but I thought that
> the community was shying away from radical changes through
> standardization, and that deep innovation in the Scheme community was
> supposed to be led by implementations.

I agree... pattern matching would be lovely, but we'd be on shaky ground
shoving it in now! Too much danger of implementations shaking their head
at such a change, and skipping R7RS as many have skipped R6RS.

> david

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/