[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> > How is this different from hash-table-replace?
> Actually, it would appear to be equivalent to hash-table-extend!.

Yes, what I meant.  In Racket it's spelled ref!, but I felt that name
was self-contradictory (a mutating accessor?!)

And it was said that ever after, if any                 John Cowan
man looked in that Stone, unless he had a               cowan@x
great strength of will to turn it to other              http://ccil.org/~cowan
purpose, he saw only two aged hands withering
in flame.   --"The Pyre of Denethor"

Scheme-reports mailing list