[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> > How is this different from hash-table-replace?
> Actually, it would appear to be equivalent to hash-table-extend!.
Yes, what I meant. In Racket it's spelled ref!, but I felt that name
was self-contradictory (a mutating accessor?!)
And it was said that ever after, if any John Cowan
man looked in that Stone, unless he had a cowan@x
great strength of will to turn it to other http://ccil.org/~cowan
purpose, he saw only two aged hands withering
in flame. --"The Pyre of Denethor"
Scheme-reports mailing list