[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
There is also the grammar as it is laid out in TSPL3:
Which is similar to what Mr. Robbin's wrote above, save for hoisting the '+' & '-' rules into the complex production above.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x>
Andrew Robbins scripsit:
I like this proposal. I have asked a friend of mine who knows how to
> On a more serious note, is there any harm in rewriting
> the current syntax a little more clearly? For example:
use proof engines to see if this grammar is equivalent to the existing
Statistics don't help a great deal in making important decisions.
Most people have more than the average number of feet, but I'm not about
to start a company selling shoes in threes. --Ross Gardler
Q. How many Prolog programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?
Scheme-reports mailing list