[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard

Per Bothner scripsit:

> Is the following a correct translation of this guard clause:

Unfortunately, `guard` is the thing I understand least about R7RS.
I recommend some testing with an R6RS system, or at least one that
implements SRFI 35.  Alternatively, the r6rs-discuss list probably has
useful information.

Don't be so humble.  You're not that great.             John Cowan
        --Golda Meir                                    cowan@x

Scheme-reports mailing list