[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
- To: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
- From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:44:26 +0200
- Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=rat+8dbtxgxsopUYtzeiw2Mr3QA@mail.gmail.com> (Alex Shinn's message of "Thu, 19 May 2011 22:17:57 -0700")
- References: <m3k4dm7jms.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTi=rat+8dbtxgxsopUYtzeiw2Mr3QA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri 20 May 2011 07:17, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> writes:
>> Funally the result of invoking a continuation captured at the toplevel
>> is not mentioned. On purpose?
>
> Yes. Have you ever seen a sane proposal for specifying
> this that all implementations could easily support?! :O
No :)
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports