[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"

On 05/19/11 16:49, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Suggestion: replace every instance of "an unspecified value", "value is
> unspecified", "result is unspecified" and the like with "unspecified
> values".  This would permit the elegant approach of defining control
> constructs with no logical value to return 0 values.  This follows the
> R6RS.

I was keen to do away with the strange dependence on precisely one value
that was not specified, but it was voted to stick with a single
undefined value being returned from things!

See #68 at http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/WG1Ballot2Results

> Andy


Alaric Snell-Pym

Scheme-reports mailing list