[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:20:41PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Bex scripsit:
> > This looks interesting, but will require some more experimentation
> > before being generally acceptable, I think. I'm wary of things like
> > this, as it seems a lot like the unholy idea that all DSSSL-style
> > keywords must be bound.
> Apropos that, you might want to look at KeywordArgumentsArcfide, which
> requires keywords (not DSSSL keywords, but colon-ized keywords) to be
> bound. The nice feature is that it's pure R5RS + records.
That's what I had in mind when I wrote the word "unholy".
Scheme-reports mailing list