[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses

Andy Wingo scripsit:
> Suggestion: make the clauses in `case' and `cond' forms (without =>,
> naturally) be BODY instances, to allow them to have definitions.  It is
> well defined AFAIK, and costs nothing.

Ticket filed.  I'm against this one, though, because of the bizarre
appearance of (cond ((pred1) (define ...) (e1)) ...).  Internal definitions
always come first everywhere else in Scheme except at the top level and
top-level BEGINs.

Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so,         John Cowan
is a tax on income.  --Lord Macnaghten (1901)           cowan@x

Scheme-reports mailing list