[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
On 2012-01-12, at 17:25, John Cowan wrote:
> Vincent Manis scripsit:
>> How about `Rational operations such as + should always produce exact
>> results where possible when given exact arguments'?
> On reflection, I think the definition of SHOULD does cover this.
> "There may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances [for an
> implementation] to ignore a particular item", namely that it does not
> allow arbitrarily large exact numbers.
It doesn't feel like it covers it to me; that sentence and the next seem
contradictory (it's an apparent, not a real, contradiction). But the
animal cruelty people have been on at me about flogging dead horses :)
Scheme-reports mailing list