[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax

Peter Bex scripsit:

> Why not allows implementations to choose whether they want to be
> backwards compatible in this way?

That was proposed but failed to pass.

> If # is not specified in the standard it can still be supported by
> individual implementations, right?


John Cowan  cowan@x  http://ccil.org/~cowan
If he has seen farther than others,
        it is because he is standing on a stack of dwarves.
                --Mike Champion, describing Tim Berners-Lee (adapted)

Scheme-reports mailing list