[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: Per Bothner <per@x>*Subject*: Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0*From*: John Cowan <cowan@x>*Date*: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:53:34 -0500*Cc*: scheme-reports@x*In-reply-to*: <50D4C454.1080401@bothner.com>*References*: <87d2y5y6fb.fsf@tines.lan> <20121221055315.GB28661@mercury.ccil.org> <87y5grsrvm.fsf@tines.lan> <CAOLEvS0hcjUBkwZnYSf6oZhqLSrKChm0Gc4bv_WkWk+XTSO4hQ@mail.gmail.com> <87mwx7smo3.fsf@tines.lan> <CAOLEvS0Pa0bYSDBrdkCy5TZkVpx_QvLMLgEFJ=LB+3=+GGTF1g@mail.gmail.com> <20121221161648.GB6196@mercury.ccil.org> <878v8rrywr.fsf@tines.lan> <20121221195750.GA28863@mercury.ccil.org> <50D4C454.1080401@bothner.com>

Per Bothner scripsit: > Admittedly, Kawa's support for precisions other than double-precision is > not as complete. Okay, I've updated the FloatPrecision page. However, passing 3.1415926535897932385L0 to Kawa produces a 53-bit result, and 1L1000 craps out with a java.lang.NumberFormatException at line 470 of BigDecimal.java. I'm using the distributed 1.13 jarfile. -- Mark Twain on Cecil Rhodes: John Cowan I admire him, I freely admit it, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan and when his time comes I shall cowan@x buy a piece of the rope for a keepsake. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

**References**:**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*leppie <xacc.ide@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*leppie <xacc.ide@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Per Bothner <per@x>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Index(es):