[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:
> > In otehr words, definitions introduced in macros can possibly shadow
> > toplevel bindings, which is a major obstacle to safe hygienic macro
> > programming.
> More than a major obstacle, I would argue that this violates hygiene
> and should not be allowed in Scheme's hygienic macros.
On that principle, how can you write a macro like define-record-type
that defines (and potentially redefines, at least in the REPL) various
Cash registers don't really add and subtract; John Cowan
they only grind their gears. cowan@x
But then they don't really grind their gears, either;
they only obey the laws of physics. --Unknown
Scheme-reports mailing list