[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>*Subject*: Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0*From*: John Cowan <cowan@x>*Date*: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:37:39 -0500*Cc*: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>*In-reply-to*: <CAGUt3y72NwudqH8jZ=Rz0v2-VZXzzAKLOO+_MOp=M-Uew4tP=g@mail.gmail.com>*References*: <8738zc9g2x.fsf@tines.lan> <CAMMPzYOKcOm+trYA0Fc+NtWfG00K0BM4hvghsxrr6L9wnCyhuQ@mail.gmail.com> <87d2yf80q3.fsf@tines.lan> <20121214223854.GX29857@mercury.ccil.org> <CAGUt3y55KEVFn=6_i9yRXR8w_e8Nk2tN7QGCF8rEhYTs2Xgrjw@mail.gmail.com> <20121215160648.GA13463@mercury.ccil.org> <CAGUt3y72NwudqH8jZ=Rz0v2-VZXzzAKLOO+_MOp=M-Uew4tP=g@mail.gmail.com>

Sascha Ziemann scripsit: > What is the benefit not following Wolfram and CL? Scheme follows mathematics, in which "real" is a subclass of "complex". Wolfram and CL both follow Fortran, in which "real" and "complex" are disjoint classes. -- There is / One art John Cowan <cowan@x> No more / No less http://www.ccil.org/~cowan To do / All things With art- / Lessness --Piet Hein _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

**References**:**[Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Index(es):