[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"

On 07/07/11 18:52, John Cowan wrote:

> As I've pointed out before, application programmers don't really need to
> make their code portable between Schemes any more, because each Scheme
> (with a very few exceptions) is itself highly portable.  It's library
> programmers that really need and benefit from standardization.


An app that doesn't use any non-portable features (GUIs? Means of
packaging apps for distribution, even?) is often rather boring.

This is also why I'd like to leave REPL semantics vague...


Alaric Snell-Pym

Scheme-reports mailing list