[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x> wrote:
> I'd like to re-raise a point which I mentioned before, but which I think
> got lost in the noise:
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/pipermail/scheme-reports/2011-April/000390.html
> In R7RS's formal syntax (chapter 7) there are many productions (mainly
> under <derived-expression>) which include hardcoded "constant names" like
> COND, DEFINE, CASE-LAMBDA etc.  I don't understand why this is neccessary
> or even desirable.

Hi Peter, thanks for checking up on this.

As you say, this was raised before and these have already
been removed in the latest trunk.


Scheme-reports mailing list