[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open?
- To: feeley@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open?
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:08:00 -0400
- Cc: scheme-reports@x
This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #439:
Bidirectional ports and port-open?
The WG voted to accept this proposal, splitting `port-open?` into
`input-port-open?` and `output-port-open?`.
Thank you for participating in the R7RS process.
Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under
tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous
languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or
obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on
unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness.
Scheme-reports mailing list