[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> I believe John's presumption is incorrect here. The correct
> interpretation of the current R7RS draft is that the binding
> refer to the redefinition in the inner scope, just as if there
> were no outer binding. If the the inner scoped binding is
> syntax then it is an error, in which case the R6RS behavior
> would be allowed (as well as nasal daemons of course).
On reflection, I agree. Editorial ticket filed.
No, John. I want formats that are actually John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous cowan@x
internal links in forms which are hideously
over-complex. --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
Scheme-reports mailing list