[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] BEGIN-FOR-SYNTAX

On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:02:05 -0400, Manuel Simoni <msimoni@x>  

> It's a quite hairy and integral part of the expansion process, and as
> such I have the feeling that it should be specified in WG1, even if
> WG1 itself has no procedural macros.

I don't think it is on the list, and I doubt that we can address it. This  
is much more likely to be in the purview of WG2. I have hinted at a form  
like this for WG2 called "meta."

	Aaron W. Hsu

Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.

Scheme-reports mailing list