[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers

To: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:32:15 +0200
Cc: scheme-reports@x
In-reply-to: <BANLkTikt-rUOQ=aRRnjihOy7-eNozYxGXg@mail.gmail.com> (Alex Shinn's message of "Fri, 13 May 2011 10:08:44 +0900")
References: <m3sjsl4nkd.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTik84AVk5TbL=iAT-YYZpe05+QoO2w@mail.gmail.com> <m3fwol4hcv.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTikYYcFWeCX3ZYHeKooO+N7pU7Ap2g@mail.gmail.com> <4DCA7950.1040500@snell-pym.org.uk> <20110511152502.GO28086@frohike.homeunix.org> <m339kl43yg.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <20110511162654.GP28086@frohike.homeunix.org> <m3y62c2xc2.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTin+0O0t6o7ytFHcS+6smZpJ+vn2_Q@mail.gmail.com> <m3iptg2tg4.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTikt-rUOQ=aRRnjihOy7-eNozYxGXg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri 13 May 2011 03:08, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> writes:

>> I wish you would address my points instead of parody and questioning my
>> motivation.
>
> The parody was meant in friendly jest, and seemed the quickest
> way to make my point - sorry if it came across otherwise.

Apologies for overreacting then.

Cheers,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.3 symbols
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread